MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392601212 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-7555

30 years of scatterometer soil moisture research at TU Wien: What’s next?

2024· preprint· en· W4392601212 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Wolfgang Wagner

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil Moisture and Remote Sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScatterometerMoistureEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyGeographyWind speed

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scatterometer soil moisture research started at the Vienna University of Technology (TU Wien) 30 years ago when attempting to use the first European C-band scatterometer flown on board of the ERS-1 satellite for wet snow mapping over the Canadian Prairies. While it quickly turned out that the detection of wet snow is impossible when the snowpack is shallow, the strong link between C-band backscatter and soil moisture under snow-free conditions became evident [1]. This motivated research on how to disentangle the backscatter contributions from soil moisture and vegetation, which cumulated in the public release of the first global satellite derived soil moisture data set in 2002 [2]. Despite the strong criticism that the scatterometer derived soil moisture data depict in reality only vegetation signals that happen to be correlated with soil moisture dynamics, the positive outcome of independent validation studies led to the decision by EUMETSAT to develop a near-real-time soil moisture service for the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) flown on board of the METOP satellites. This service, being the first of its kind, became operational in 2008, and was later integrated into the Satellite Application Facility for Support to Operational Hydrology and Water Management (H SAF). For continuously improving this ASCAT service, TU Wien has carried out extensive research to quantify the soil moisture retrieval errors and improve the retrieval algorithm and workflows. In this presentation, I will provide an overview of the main developments over the past years, discuss open research challenges, and provide an outlook to the next ASCAT product releases and the upcoming, next-generation scatterometer instrument called SCA, to be flown on the Metop-SG B-satellites.References[1] Wagner et al. (1995) Application of Low-Resolution Active Microwave Remote Sensing (C-Band) over the Canadian Prairies, in Proc. of the 17th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada 13-15 June 1995, 21-28.[2] Scipal et al. (2002) The Global Soil Moisture Archive 1992-2000 from ERS Scatterometer Data: First Results, In: Proceedings IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARRS2002), Toronto, Canada, 24-28 June 2002, 1399-1401.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Moisture and Remote SensingFrench-language works237,207