Frontoparietal network integrity supports cognitive function despite atrophy and hypoperfusion in pre-symptomatic frontotemporal dementia: multimodal analysis of brain function, structure and perfusion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION Genetic mutation carriers of frontotemporal dementia can remain cognitively well despite neurodegeneration. A better understanding of brain structural, perfusion and functional patterns in pre-symptomatic stage could inform accurate staging and potential mechanisms. METHODS We included 207 pre-symptomatic genetic mutation carriers and 188 relatives without mutations. The grey matter volume, cerebral perfusion, and resting-state functional network maps were co-analyzed using linked independent component analysis (LICA). Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship of LICA components to genetic status and cognition. RESULTS Pre-symptomatic mutation carriers showed an age-related decrease in the left frontoparietal network integrity while non-carriers did not. Executive functions of mutation carriers became dependent on the left frontoparietal network integrity in older age. DISCUSSION The frontoparietal network integrity of pre-symptomatic mutation carriers showed a distinctive relationship to age and cognition compared to non-carriers, suggesting a contribution of the network integrity to brain resilience, despite atrophy and hypoperfusion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".