Constraints on long-term seismic hazard from an intact, vulnerable stalagmite for the surroundings of Ördöglik (Čertova diera) part of Domica cave, Slovakia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To verify seismic hazard maps by independent observations that serves long-term information should be necessary. It requires studying vulnerable dripstones, since they survived all earthquakes that have occurred over thousands of years, depending on the age of them. Examination of an intact vulnerable stalagmite (IVSTM) in Ördöglik part of Domica cave (Slovakia) has been done. This IVSTM is suitable for estimating the upper limit of horizontal ground acceleration (HGA) generated by prehistoric earthquakes. This research is the continuation of our previous examination of IVSTMs in Baradla and Domica cave system, north-east Hungary. The density, the Young’s modulus and the tensile failure stress of the samples originating from broken speleothems have been measured in geo-mechanical laboratories, whereas the dimensions and natural frequency of the IVSTM was determined by different types of in situ observations. The value of HGA resulting in failure and the natural frequency of the IVSTM were assessed by theoretical calculations. The ages of the samples taken from a column next to the investigated IVSTM at different heights have been determined by MC-ICPMS analysis. The measured ages fall between about 7.6 and 2.4 kyr. The critical HGAvalues as a function of time going back into the past determined from the stalagmite that we investigated are presented. Our results show that all values of probabilistic seismic hazard maps, SHARE Map (Giardini et al. 2014) and PSHA Map (Tóth et al. 2006) at the location of Ördöglik part of Domica cave, are above the critical horizontal ground acceleration (CHGA) curve calculated by using the dimensions, geo-mechanical and elastic parameters of IVSTM, and the values of CHGA caves are lower than 0.05g since 2.7 kyr (0.05g was estimated by Szeidovitz et al. (2008) using another vulnerable stalagmite 4 km far from Ördöglik, in the Baradla cave.) All these means that the seismic hazard is overestimated at the territory of Ördöglik, Domica cave. This result have to be taken into account when calculating the seismic potential of faults near to Ördöglik part of Domica cave (e.g. Darnó and Rozsnyó lines).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".