MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392607401 · doi:10.3289/tr_2d-mcs_so294

Technical Report for Raw 2D MCS Reflection Data, R/V Sonne Cruise 294, Vancouver (Canada) – Port Hueneme (USA), 13/09/22 – 27/10/23

2024· report· en· W4392607401 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Riedel, Jörg Bialas, Elisa Klein, Cord Papenberg, Janine Berndt

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSonneCruiseRaw dataPort (circuit theory)Reflection (computer programming)OceanographyEngineeringGeologyComputer scienceElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The raw 2D multichannel seismic reflection data in this project were acquired during expedition SO294 offshore Vancouver Island, Canada, using two different sources, i.e., a single GI Gun and a GGun array. The data were recorded with an 184-channel streamer. The objectives of expedition SO294 were twofold: provision of geophysical images to constrain the hazard potential of the Cascadia subduction zone, and to constrain the geophysical properties of the oceanic crust to assess its storage potential for carbon capture and storage (CCS). The data comprise 1660 line kilometers and are provided in raw format (SEG-D) and associated standardized metadata. Detailed information on the acquisition can be found in the SO294 cruise report (https://doi.org/10.48433/cr_so294). In addition, this technical report is provided with the 2D multichannel seismic reflection data set.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0550.048

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207