MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392609584 · doi:10.33137/ijournal.v8i2.41039

The TikTok Problem

2023· article· en· W4392609584 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hannah Chafe

Bibliographic record

VenueThe iJournal Student Journal of the Faculty of Information · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology in Education and Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Social media is rapidly establishing itself as the premier repository for personal memories, but with few reliable preservation methods available, there is a huge risk for cultural memory loss. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of the social media platform TikTok exploded all over the world as users searched for a way to connect with each other. Therefore, TikTok became an essential part of building community spaces online, especially in the cosplay and fantasy roleplay communities. Using Abigail De Kosnik’s framework of “Rogue Archives” this paper looks at these community spaces on TikTok to ask questions about digital preservation and how personal digital archives function on social media.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.014
Scholarly communication0.0080.023
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0060.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0440.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe iJournal Student Journal of the Faculty of InformationSame topicBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningFrench-language works237,207