MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392613304 · doi:10.4103/ni.ni_1191_21

CNKSR2-Related Developmental and Epileptic Encephalopathy with Spike-Wave Activation in Sleep: A Report of Two Additional Cases and Review of the Literature

2024· article· en· W4392613304 on OpenAlexaff
Robyn Whitney, Cristina Go, Ahmed Abushama, Puneet Jain

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology India · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSpike (software development)EpilepsySleep (system call)NeuroscienceElectroencephalographyAudiologyEncephalopathyPediatricsPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

CNKSR2 variants have been associated with X linked intellectual disability and epilepsy including developmental and epileptic encephalopathy with spike wave activation in sleep (D/EE SWAS) in males. We aimed to describe a sibling pair with a novel pathogenic variant in CNKSR2 with D/EE SWAS and review published cases of D/EE SWAS. A retrospective chart review and a comprehensive review of the literature were conducted. Two brothers with a novel pathogenic variant in the CNKSR2 gene (c. 114delG, p.Ile39SerfsX14) were identified. The epilepsy phenotype was similar to previous cases and was characterized by early onset seizures, nocturnal seizures (focal motor with/without impaired awareness), global developmental delay and language impairment, frontal central temporal predominant epileptiform discharges with a spike wave index >95%, and treatment resistance. However, phenotypic variability was observed and the younger brother had milder neuro developmental impairment, and the diagnosis of D/EE SWAS was made by surveillance electro encephalogram (EEG). Literature search yielded 23 cases, and their clinical/neuro physiological features are discussed. To conclude, CNKSR2 related D/EE SWAS may be early onset and occur before the age of 5 years in some. Early surveillance EEG may aid in diagnosis. Phenotypic variability was observed in our cases as well as sibling pairs in the literature, which may impact genetic counseling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology IndiaSame topicGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFrench-language works237,207