MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392616678 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00422.2023

Characterizing the influence of cardiorespiratory fitness on left atrial size and function in the general population

2024· article· en· W4392616678 on OpenAlexaff
Luke Spencer, Leah Wright, Stephen Foulkes, S. Rowe, Hayley T. Dillon, Rachel E. Climie, Ashley Bigaran, Kristel Janssens, A Mitchell, Imogen Wallace, Anniina Lindqvist, Lauren Burnham, David Prior, Erin J. Howden, André La Gerche

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Effects of Exercise
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDepartment of Health and Aged Care, Australian GovernmentNational Health and Medical Research CouncilWorld Cancer Research FundNational Heart Foundation of AustraliaWellcome Trust
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessPopulationFunction (biology)Internal medicineCardiologyMedicineDemographyBiologySociologyEvolutionary biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Left atrial (LA) structure better predicts cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) than LA function. LA function adds little statistical value to predictive models of peak oxygen uptake (V̇o2peak) in healthy individuals, suggesting limited discriminatory for CRF once LA size is factored. In the wider population of ostensibly healthy individuals, the association between increased LA volume and higher CRF provides an important counter to the association between atrial enlargement and heart failure symptoms in those with cardiac pathology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicCardiovascular Effects of ExerciseFrench-language works237,207