MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392616884 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-2378

Applications of GeoAI in Extracting National Value-Added Products from Historical Airborne Photography

2024· preprint· en· W4392616884 on OpenAlexaffabout
Mozhdeh Shahbazi, M. A. Sokolov, Ella Mahoro, Victor Alhassan, Evangelos Bousias Alexakis, Pierre Gravel, Mathieu Turgeon-Pelchat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSatellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
Canadian institutionsGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotogrammetryComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceGeospatial analysisRemote sensingComputer visionAnalyticsAerial photographyWorkflowCartographyGeographyData miningDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian national air photo library (NAPL) comprises millions of historical airborne photographs dating over 100 years. Historical photographs are rich chronicles of countrywide geospatial information. They can be used for creating long-term time series and supporting various analytics such as monitoring expansion/shrinking rates of built areas, forest structure change measurement, measuring thinning and retreating rates of glaciers, and determining rates of erosion at coastlines. Various technical solutions are developed at Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) to generate analysis-ready mapping products from NAPL.Photogrammetric Processing with a Focus on Automated Georeferencing of Historical Photos: The main technical challenge of photogrammetric processing is identifying reference observations, such as ground control points (GCP). Reference observations are crucial to accurately georeference historical photos and ensure the spatial alignment of historical and modern mapping products. This is critical for creating time series and performing multi-temporal change analytics. In our workflow, GCPs are identified by automatically matching historical images to modern optical satellite/airborne ortho-rectified images. In the matching process, first, we use convolutional neural networks (D2Net) for joint feature detection and description in the intensity space. Then, we convert intensity images to phase congruency maps, which show less sensitivity to nonlinear radiometric differences of the images, and we extract an additional set of features using the Fast detector and describe them using the radiation-invariant feature transform (RIFT). Feature-matching outliers are detected and removed via random sample consensus (Ransac), enforcing a homographic transformation between corresponding images. The remaining control points are manually verified through a graphical interface built as a QGIS plugin. The verified control points are then used in a bundle block adjustment, where external orientation parameters of the historical images and the intrinsic calibration parameters of the cameras are refined, followed by dense matching and generation of digital elevation models and ortho-rectified mosaics using conventional photogrammetric approaches. These solutions are implemented using our in-house libraries as well as MicMac open-source software. Through the presentation, examples of the generated products and their qualities will be demonstrated.Deep Colourization, Super Resolution and Semantic Segmentation: Considering the fact that NAPL mostly contains grayscale photos, their visual appeal and interpretability are less than modern colour images. In addition, the automated extraction of colour-sensitive features from them, e.g. water bodies, is more complicated than colour images. With this regard, we have developed fully automated approaches to colourize historical ortho-rectified mosaics based on image-to-image translation models. Through the presentation, the performance of a variety of solutions like conditional generative adversarial networks (GAN), encoder-decoder networks, vision transformers, and probabilistic diffusion models will be compared. In addition, using a customized GAN, we improve the spatial resolution of historical images which are scanned from printed photos at low resolution (as opposed to being scanned directly from film rolls at high resolution). Our semantic segmentation models, trained initially on optical satellite and airborne imagery, are also adapted to historical air photos for extracting water bodies, road networks, building outlines, and forested areas. The performance of these models on historical photos will be demonstrated during the presentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSatellite Image Processing and PhotogrammetryFrench-language works237,207