MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392617225 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-6566

Ionospheric Conductance Derived from Satellite Measurments: Limitations and Implications

2024· preprint· en· W4392617225 on OpenAlexaff
Pouya Pourkarim, D. J. Knudsen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEarthquake Detection and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonospherePhysicsPerturbation (astronomy)Magnetic fieldConductanceAmpereSatelliteDuskQuantum electrodynamicsComputational physicsGeophysicsVoltageCondensed matter physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ionospheric Pedersen conductance ∑P can be remotely measured using electric and perturbation magnetic fields measured above the high – latitude ionosphere, subject to assumptions of sheet – like current systems, quasi – static electric and magnetic fields, neglect of magnetic perturbations generated by Hall currents, and locally constant ∑P (Sugiura et al., 1982). Using Swarm measurements, we see large variability and lower – than expected magnitudes at small scales, and dawn – dusk asymmetries in large scales of ∑P upon comparison with existing models and results. To rectify the observed discrepancies, we revisit the underlying assumptions, provide root – cause analysis, and discuss the implications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.809
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEarthquake Detection and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207