MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392619997 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15928

Field study of permafrost molards from diverse origins of landslides in Matanuska Valley, Alaska

2024· preprint· en· W4392619997 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Calvin Beck, Susan J. Conway, Costanza Morino, Bretwood Higman, Bill Billmeier, Marianne Font

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsPermafrostLandslideGeologyDebrisGeomorphologyTerrainPhysical geographyRockfallGeographyOceanographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Permafrost is receding and warming globally due to current climate change trends. Mountain regions with areas of discontinuous to isolated permafrost are especially sensitive to these changes. In high relief mountainsides, ground ice can be essential in stabilising mountain slopes and can result in slope failures if this ice degrades. To determine the state of degrading permafrost and related slope failures, we studied the Matanuska Valley in Alaska (USA), an area characterised by a high density of landslides with permafrost molards .Permafrost molards are cones of loose debris that can be found in landslide deposits in periglacial terrains, originating from ice-cemented blocks of debris that are transported down-slope within the landslide. These ice-cemented blocks are fragmented parts of the frozen material initially located in the landslide source area. Therefore, they can indicate the presence of degrading permafrost at the level of the detachment zone. Landslides containing permafrost molards have been detected in geographically and geologically diverse regions such as Argentina, Canada, Colorado, the European Alps, Greenland, Iceland, and Norway.Our Alaskan field site contains 9 molard landslides within only a 15 km radius. These densely clustered landslides have a unique variety of geological, geomorphological and dynamic characteristics. This allows us to study a large parameter space of permafrost slope instabilities within a small region. Therefore, we studied the following five molard landslides in detail: Amulet, East and West Index Lake, Yellowjacket, and Matanuska River 2021 landslide.These landslides are diverse in terms of landslide type, transported volume, run-out length, source materials, expositions, and altitudes. For instance, the Matanuska River 2021 landslide is a rotational slide of initially forested terrain with the head scarp at 780 m.a.s.l., and with a length of ~400 m plunging into the Matanuska River. In contrast, the Amulet landslide is a channelized debris slide with the head scarp at 1500 m.a.s.l., a run out length of ~2100 m, and with hundreds of molards with diameters ranging up to 44 m in the landslide deposits.To document the variability between these landslides, we performed traditional geomorphological and geological field measurements, dug transects in the molards, took samples, and we obtained digital terrain models of the landslides by drone-based photogrammetry. We acquired drone-based photogrammetry data of Yellowjacket landslide only two weeks after the failure, before the initial ice-cemented blocks fully degraded, as well as four years after the slope failure. For the first time, this allows us to compare spatial data of permafrost molards before and after the degradation of the initial ice-cemented blocks and to perform statistical analysis on this data.We investigated molard shape, size, and size-distribution parameters to compare these to variables such as source material and expected permafrost conditions. This allows us to confine the composition of the initially ice-cemented blocks of debris, which will help us to understand under what conditions molards can form. In the future, this will allow us to quantify the currently often uncertain state of mountain permafrost more precisely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→