MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392620204 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-15771

Duplex Structures in the EastGRIP Ice Core - the Loss of Stratigraphic Integrity

2024· preprint· en· W4392620204 on OpenAlexaff
Julien Westhoff, Paul D. Bons, Nicolas Stoll, Ilka Weikusat, Chantal Zeppenfeld, Tobias Erhardt, Dorthe Dahl‐Jensen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIce coreCore (optical fiber)Duplex (building)GeologyStructural integrityPaleontologyPetrologyChemistryComputer scienceEngineeringClimatologyStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The EastGRIP ice core is drilled through the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream, which has a surface velocity of 55 m/yr towards NNE at the drill site. Deriving a better understanding of internal deformation and the rheology within an ice stream is crucial for ice flow models and projections of future solid ice discharge. We use the line scanner to make the stratigraphy visible and document disturbances in the layering in the depth region from 1375 to 2120 m covering a large part of the Glacial Period. Disturbances are visible in cuts perpendicular to the ice flow direction, and not in cuts parallel to flow. Between these two extremes, we have a gradual change in type and amount of disturbances. As with all other ice cores, the ice in the EastGRIP ice core is thinned vertically. Due to the advanced thinning of layers, it is clear that the visible structures are not the remnants of surface features, such as sastrugi. However, the disturbances, or deformation structures, are the result of strain caused by the stress field at the EastGRIP site, which is described by a compressional component perpendicular to and an extensional component parallel to the ice flow direction. In most samples cut perpendicular to ice flow, i.e. with the compressional setting visible, we find structures, very similar to geological duplex structures. We identify duplex structures extending the width of the core by the sudden change of layer tilt within one bag at a time. Duplex structures are confined by layer parallel shear zones, with tilted layers in between them. The small-scale shear zones only become evident due to the deformation they cause and can extend well beyond these visible structures. We furthermore suggest, that shear zones are present parallel to layering, but do not show up, as a lateral displacement of layers, does not disrupt the vertical profiles. We discuss one example, from a depth of 1651 m (26 ky b2k), in detail. We further investigate approx. 30 m of chemical CFA data, mainly NH4+ and Ca++, from the same depth. We find peaks that double, in both the visual stratigraphy as well as the CFA data. These may be a result of the duplex structures that stack the stratigraphy and have the potential to disturb the climate record. Our results display the importance of understanding internal deformation when interpreting the climate record.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMethane Hydrates and Related Phenomena→French-language works237,207→