Vertical fluxes in subpolar eddies from a high-resolution, multiplatform experiment in the Labrador Sea
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mesoscale structures are key dynamical features of the ocean. They are associated with a variety of short lived and small-scale dynamics linked to physical, biological, and chemical processes at the submesoscale, such as cascading energy, impacting ocean stratification, and guiding ocean carbon and oxygen uptake. In the high latitudes, the spatial extent of the mesoscale is only tens of kilometres, making it challenging to observe the submesoscale processes. In August-September 2022, an extensive submesoscale-resolving multiplatform experiment was conducted across an Irminger Ring in the Labrador Sea. The experiment leveraged two underwater electric gliders equipped with nitrate, microstructure shear, chlorophyll fluorescence, oxygen, and turbidity sensors, operated in concert with a variety of ship operated instruments including underway-CTD’s, a moving vessel profiler, Thermosalinograph, ADCPs and a X-band radar system. Observations were acquired both, along the peripheries and within the core of the eddy, and offered insight into submesoscale dynamics of the ring. Making use of nearly concurrent turbulence and nutrients observations, we estimated the vertical flux pattern across the eddy’s frontal and interior regions. From the recorded and expected glider vehicle motion a vertical water velocity could be inferred and compared with the nutrient flux pattern. The stability of the ring was tracked with surface drifters, for weeks after the ship and glider survey ended, and a link between the disintegration of the ring and an atmospheric event was investigated
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".