MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392628927 · doi:10.26868/25222708.2023.1399

A novel model reduction and calibration methodology to define lumped parameters of building thermal models

2023· article· en· W4392628927 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueBuilding Simulation Conference proceedings · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBuilding Energy and Comfort Optimization
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThermostatComputer scienceReduction (mathematics)CalibrationBuilding modelModel order reductionThermal massInterval (graph theory)ThermalMathematical optimizationEngineeringAlgorithmSimulationMathematicsMechanical engineeringStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a systematic methodology based on frequency domain techniques to develop reduced order models for building heat flows: providing the right detail of the building and the possibility to optimize the control actions for different thermal zones during demand-response events. This work automatically identifies the best grey box Resistance-Capacitance model to describe the building thermal dynamics. The methodology is applied to a building in Quebec, Canada, for which data are provided by smart thermostats. The algorithm develops two models of first and second order, corresponding to the main aggregated thermal zones. Accuracy is guaranteed in a certain confidence interval for the minimum number of selected parameters, maximizing the model quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.276
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it