MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392636220

Understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of periventricular nodular heterotopias associated with mutations in the NEDD4L gene

2017· preprint· fr· W4392636220 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hélène Jagline

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicUrologic and reproductive health conditions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleE-RareAgence Nationale de la RechercheFondation Maladies RaresEuropean CommissionNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsPathophysiologyGeneticsBiologyPsychologyNeuroscienceMedicinePathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les hétérotopies nodulaires périventriculaires (HNP) sont des malformations du cortex cérébral caractérisées par la formation d’amas de neurones dans des parties inappropriées du cerveau. Elles peuvent être responsables d’une multitude de troubles tels qu’une hypotonie, un déficit intellectuel ou des épilepsies. Notre équipe a montré que le gène NEDD4L codant pour une E3 ubiquitine ligase était responsable d’HNP associées à des syndactilies. Des études cellulaires et une approche in utero nous ont permis de montrer une instabilité de la protéine mutante et des problèmes lors de la neurogénèse, le positionnement neuronal et la translocation terminale. Des études plus approfondies mettent en lumière le rôle critique de NEDD4L dans différentes voies de signalisation. En effet, alors que l’excès de protéine NEDD4L WT conduit à une dérégulation de DAB1 et de la voie mTORC1, l’instabilité des protéines mutantes conduit à une dérégulation des voies mTOC1 et AKT. L’ensemble de ces données permet de mieux comprendre le rôle critique de NEDD4L dans la régulation des voies mTOR et sa contribution dans le développement cortical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.118
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrologic and reproductive health conditionsFrench-language works237,207