MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392636305

Brn2 and Zic1 specify the neuronal identity of mouse embryonic stem cells differentiated by retinoic acid treatment

2014· preprint· fr· W4392636305 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Sylvia Urban

Bibliographic record

Venuetheses.fr (ABES) · 2014
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of GeneticsInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche MédicaleAgence Nationale de la RechercheInstitut National Du CancerCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueAssociation pour la Recherche sur le Cancer
KeywordsRetinoic acidEmbryonic stem cellStem cellBiologyCell biologyIdentity (music)Computational biologyGeneticsGenePhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les cellules souches embryonnaires (ES) murines peuvent être différenciées in vitro en une population homogène de neurones glutamatergiques semblables aux neurones présents dans le cortex in vivo, suite à un traitement par l’acide rétinoïque (AR). Bien que le rôle de l’AR soit bien étudié, les facteurs qui spécifient le destin neuronal ne sont pas connus. Nous montrons ici que Pou3f2 (Brn2) est un facteur essentiel à la différenciation neuronale des cellules ES in vitro. L’utilisation de l’approche de différenciation in vitro associée à des techniques de génomique à haut débit (RNA-seq, ChIP-seq) a permis d’identifier des gènes régulés directement ou indirectement par Brn2. Parmi ces gènes se trouvent Ascl1, Hes5 ou Pou6f1, qui sont des gènes clés dans la neurogenèse. La comparaison de nos données avec des expériences précédemment publiées nous a permis d’identifier un nombre restreint de gènes cibles de Brn2 quelque soit le protocole de différenciation utilisé. Parmi ces gènes se trouve Zic1. Nous montrons que Zic1 coopère avec Brn2 pour spécifier le destin neuronal des cellules ES in vitro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuetheses.fr (ABES)Same topicPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchFrench-language works237,207