Structure and Tectonic Evolution of the NW Sulu Sea Basin (SE Asia)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We discuss the tectonic structure, seismic stratigraphy and evolution of the NW Sulu Sea using reprocessed 2D reflection profiles. The NW Sulu Sea is located between the Palawan continental shelf and the Cagayan Ridge and represents the northern part of the Sulu Sea, a marginal sea resulting from Paleogene extension and subsequent Neogene contraction due to convergence between the Palawan and the Philippine blocks. The basin consists of six seismo‐stratigraphic units overlying crystalline basement. Syn‐orogenic depocenters contain calibrated Middle Miocene to, possibly, Lower Miocene units, while rift‐related depocenters consist of uncalibrated but tentatively dated Paleogene to Lower Miocene units. Thickness and depth maps of the main units and bounding horizons differentiate the Piedra‐Blanca and the Rasa domains, separated by the NW‐Sulu‐Break major tectonic structure. Fault‐bounded rift‐related depocenters are strongly segmented. We interpret that NW‐SE and NE‐SW trending zones accommodate shape and trend variations of these depocenters. We suggest that these zones may link rift segments, recording different extensional deformation. Miocene thrusting and folding in the Piedra‐Blanca Domain and mudflow with associated gravitational structures in the Rasa Domain influenced the deposition of syn‐orogenic units. Rift structures inherited from rift segmentation may have conditioned the style and distribution of contractional deformation during the subsequent incipient reactivation during contraction. In the context of SE Asia, our results support that the timing of rifting of the NW Sulu Sea overlaps with the opening of the South China Sea and the North Palawan margin, which may indicate a common geodynamic driving force triggering extension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".