MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392643100 · doi:10.1063/5.0189385

Interpeak characterizations for spontaneous otoacoustic emissions

2024· article· en· W4392643100 on OpenAlexafffund
Christopher Bergevin, Rebecca Whiley, Hero P. Wit, Pim van Dijk

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTonotopyAcousticsAmplitudePhysicsComputer scienceBiological systemBiologyNeuroscienceCochleaOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One manifestation of the "active ear" is the presence of spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE), which also exhibit salient connections to perception such as threshold microstructure.Historically, SOAE modeling efforts initially focused upon a single limit-cycle oscillator.However, SOAE spectra from a given ear typically exhibit multiple peaks, and more current models consider a spatially distributed tonotopic system with various types of coupling.SOAEs have nonstationary properties (e.g., amplitude and frequency modulations), which may be crucially tied to the coupling of active elements in the ear.Thus, to better biophysically constrain models, this study seeks to improve characterization of general non-stationary features of SOAE peaks as well as interrelations of such between them.Given the ubiquitous nature of SOAE across the animal kingdom, we analyze SOAE waveforms from a variety of species exhibiting disparate inner ear morphologies (e.g., human, barn owls, Anolis lizards).This manuscript provides a preliminary account of our analyses and focuses on the Anolis lizard.Upon filtering in the spectral domain, we characterize temporal properties of individual peaks, including possible amplitude-modulation (AM) and frequency-modulation (FM).Further, we perform correlation analyses of such between peaks to determine types of interactions and how such might vary across time.Initial results are consistent with previous reports (e.g., [1,2]) in that an SOAE interpeak correlations for a given ear are idiosyncratic: Sometimes peaks (adjacent or not) exhibit correlated (positive or negative) AM and/or FM fluctuations with delays up to the order of milliseconds (typically longer for humans, shorter for lizards), while sometimes no correlation is observed.We attempt to frame these results within the broader context of specific SOAE modeling approaches.A common feature of the healthy ear across the animal kingdom is the generation of spontaneous otoacoustic emission (SOAE).This phenomenon is often described as a by-product of an underlying active mechanism that metabolically boosts the sensitivity and selectivity of the ear.While many theories have been proposed (e.g., [3,4,5,6]), SOAE generation remains relatively poorly understood, especially when considering gross inner ear morphological differences across the animal kingdom [7].Several key characteristics of SOAE are commonly observed.First, not all ears emit.A healthy individual can have normal hearing but exhibit no SOAE.Further, the presence of SOAE is common but not universal across the animal kingdom: While relatively robust in primates and numerous lizard species, SOAE activity is conspicuously absent in many animals commonly used in auditory neurophysiology.For example, SOAE in mice are exceedingly rare unless mutations to their tectorial membrane are present [8].Second, SOAE activity is mostly confined to the most sensitive portion of the audiogram.Third is the general characteristic that SOAE commonly manifest as peaks of variable width in the spectrum of the measured microphone signal (hence "SOAEs" from an ear).This narrowband feature has provided a focal point for many facets of SOAE analysis and theory, despite the fact SOAE activity can also be present in a broadband fashion (e.g., the "baseline" activity in geckos [9] and skinks).Fourth, these peaks can (but not always) exhibit statistical properties consistent with self-sustained sinusoids [10,11,12].Lastly, SOAE activity appears to readily interact with external acoustic stimuli, allowing for measurements such as "suppression tuning curves" that can exhibit selectivity similar to that of single auditory nerve fibers (e.g., [13]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsFrench-language works237,207