MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392646336 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-19192

The Influence of Bioturbation on Sandstone Brittleness: A Comparative Analysis of Massive Sandstone versus Bioturbated Sandstone (Ordovician Qasim Formation-Saudi Arabia)

2024· preprint· en· W4392646336 on OpenAlexaff
Moaz Salih, Hassan A. Eltom, Andrew D. La Croix, Shahin E. Dashtgard, Mutasim Osman, Mazin Bashri

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBioturbationOrdovicianGeologyGeochemistryBrittlenessPaleontologyPetrologyGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bioturbation is the reorganization of sediment particles by living organisms, mainly infauna, as they move through and over sediment, feed, and construct dwellings. The biosedimentary structures produced by organisms alter the petrophysical and mechanical properties of the sediment, including porosity, permeability, and brittleness, such that the petrophysical and mechanical properties of bioturbated sedimentary strata commonly differ from that of unbioturbated strata. This directly impacts fluid flow through sedimentary strata. In this study, we investigate the impact of bioturbation on sandstone brittleness through the comparison of seemingly massive sandstone with bioturbated sandstone in the Ordovician Kahfa Member of the Qasim Formation in northwestern Saudi Arabia. Through a series of field observations (sedimentological descriptions and fracture intensity measurements) and laboratory analyses (thin-section petrography, SEM, XRD, XRF, spot permeability and hardness, as well as Vp and Vs measurements) the mechanical properties of bioturbated and unbioturbated sandstone are determined. The results indicate that although both units have moderate to high porosity (17–25%), the bioturbated sandstone units exhibit decreased brittleness (~ 0.2 fractures·m-1) relative to their unbioturbated counterparts (~ 2 fractures·m-1). Young’s Modulus of bioturbated sandstone ranges from 4.0 to 5.7 GPa, while unbioturbated sandstone has much higher moduli, ranging from 15.1 to 17.6 GPa. This decreased brittleness in bioturbated sandstone is attributed to locally enhanced porosity, altered grain size distribution, and the incorporation of clay particles, all of which are associated with bioturbation. These modifications result in a less brittle sandstone and, by extension, a reduction in fracture density. Understanding the role of bioturbation in altering sandstone brittleness is not only significant for geotechnical and geological applications but also holds implications for civil engineering and environmental science. Further research into the specific mechanisms underlying bioturbation-induced changes in sandstone properties is recommended for comprehensive insights into this phenomenon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDrilling and Well Engineering→French-language works237,207→