MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392646349 · doi:10.1145/3610978.3640727

The Space Between Us: Bridging Human and Robotic Worlds in Space Exploration

2024· article· en· W4392646349 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Exploration and Technology
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridging (networking)RobotHuman–robot interactionSpace (punctuation)Human–computer interactionSpace explorationComputer scienceContext (archaeology)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringAerospace engineeringGeographyComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robots are key to human space exploration goals, as they are able to perform tasks and reach locations that humans cannot. Research on Human-Robot Interaction for these types of robot applications is crucial for mission success, but relevant findings have not yet been synthesized into a corpus of knowledge. We are in the process of conducting a scoping review of Human-Robot Interaction research in the context of outer space exploration. Our initial findings suggest that space Human-Robot Interaction research falls within 8 interconnected themes. We hope that these preliminary results will be useful to researchers aiming to investigate Human-Robot Interaction for space exploration applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.290

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpace Exploration and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207