Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unedited and raw time-based media—dailies, rushes, scratches, original or source footage, B-roll, and more—go by different names depending on the context of creation. This article examines the collecting, preservation, and access practices of raw, unedited, and auxiliary media through the lens of initial findings of a scoping review underway by the authors. Exploring the literature and incorporating post-custodial and media archeology frameworks expanded the authors’ research design to embrace the potential of access, reuse, and reactivation of materials as means of remediation. This paper discusses the potential raw, unedited, and auxiliary media pose for galleries, libraries, archives, and museums, as well as broader communities, and it encourages readers to embrace relationships with raw and unedited media, reuse, and resistance by way of community and artistic intervention. [This article is an expansion of a presentation given at the International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (IASA) conference, held virtually in September 2021.]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it