MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392651679 · doi:10.1128/aem.00052-24

The prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiome of Pacific oyster spat is shaped by ocean warming but not acidification

2024· article· en· W4392651679 on OpenAlexafffund
Kevin Xu Zhong, Amy M. Chan, Brenna Collicutt, Maxim Daspe, Jan F. Finke, Megan Foss, Timothy J. Green, Christopher D. G. Harley, Amelia V. Hesketh, Kristina M. Miller, Sarah P. Otto, Kate Rolheiser, Rob Saunders, Ben Sutherland, Curtis A. Suttle

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Environmental Microbiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaVancouver Island UniversityShell (Canada)Tula FoundationUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBritish Columbia Knowledge Development FundHakai InstituteCanada Foundation for InnovationMinistry of Technology, Innovation and Citizens' ServicesFisheries and Oceans CanadaTula FoundationGordon and Betty Moore Foundation
KeywordsBiologyOcean acidificationCrassostreaEffects of global warming on oceansMicrobiomeEcologyPacific oysterRelative species abundanceBacteroidetesOysterPhylumAbundance (ecology)ZoologyGlobal warmingClimate changeBacteria16S ribosomal RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Pacific oysters ( Magallana gigas, a.k.a. Crassostrea gigas ), the most widely farmed oysters, are under threat from climate change and emerging pathogens. In part, their resilience may be affected by their microbiome, which, in turn, may be influenced by ocean warming and acidification. To understand these impacts, we exposed early-development Pacific oyster spat to different temperatures (18°C and 24°C) and p CO 2 levels (800, 1,600, and 2,800 µatm) in a fully crossed design for 3 weeks. Under all conditions, the microbiome changed over time, with a large decrease in the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic ciliates ( Uronema marinum ) in all treatments with time. The microbiome composition differed significantly with temperature, but not acidification, indicating that Pacific oyster spat microbiomes can be altered by ocean warming but is resilient to ocean acidification in our experiments. Microbial taxa differed in relative abundance with temperature, implying different adaptive strategies and ecological specializations among microorganisms. Additionally, a small proportion (~0.2% of the total taxa) of the relatively abundant microbial taxa were core constituents (>50% occurrence among samples) across different temperatures, p CO 2 levels, or time. Some taxa, including A4b bacteria and members of the family Saprospiraceae in the phyla Chloroflexi (syn. Chloroflexota ) and Bacteroidetes (syn. Bacteroidota ), respectively, as well as protists in the genera Labyrinthula and Aplanochytrium in the class Labyrinthulomycetes , and Pseudoperkinsus tapetis in the class Ichthyosporea were core constituents across temperatures, p CO 2 levels, and time, suggesting that they play an important, albeit unknown, role in maintaining the structural and functional stability of the Pacific oyster spat microbiome in response to ocean warming and acidification. These findings highlight the flexibility of the spat microbiome to environmental changes. IMPORTANCE Pacific oysters are the most economically important and widely farmed species of oyster, and their production depends on healthy oyster spat. In turn, spat health and productivity are affected by the associated microbiota; yet, studies have not scrutinized the effects of temperature and p CO 2 on the prokaryotic and eukaryotic microbiomes of spat. Here, we show that both the prokaryotic and, for the first time, eukaryotic microbiome of Pacific oyster spat are surprisingly resilient to changes in acidification, but sensitive to ocean warming. The findings have potential implications for oyster survival amid climate change and underscore the need to understand temperature and p CO 2 effects on the microbiome and the cascading effects on oyster health and productivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Environmental MicrobiologySame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207