Big Data Review of the Influence of Agricultural Sector Development on Economic Resilience
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The agricultural sector in the East Java's GDP structure has been stable at around 11% over the past 5 years, despite disruptions caused by the Covid pandemic. The stable development of the agricultural sector has contributed to the region's increased resilience. This study aims to identify the relationship between factors influencing agricultural development and resilience in East Java and to formulate related development strategies. The method used in this study is Correlation and Regression. Regional resilience is viewed as the output of changes in the rate of GDP growth. Factors in agricultural development are viewed from Agricultural Production, Land Factors using Big data, including LST, NDVI, and NDWI, Internet User Farmers and Farmer Populations. The results of the study indicate that significant influential factors in agricultural development are found in NDVI, NDWI, and Farmer Population. The study shows that for East Java, development strategies through digital farming have not yet been able to increase regional resilience, and conventional agricultural development methods still dominate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it