Guía clínica de adecuación y prescripción de la diálisis peritoneal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En los últimos años se ha modificado el significado de adecuación en diálisis peritoneal. Hemos asistido a una transición desde un concepto de adecuación enfocado esencialmente a la obtención de unos objetivos en determinados parámetros –aclaramiento de solutos y ultrafiltración– a una aproximación más holística centrada en la calidad de vida del paciente. El propósito de este documento es proporcionar a sus destinatarios recomendaciones, actualizadas y centradas en nuestro entorno sociosanitario, para la adecuación y prescripción de la diálisis peritoneal. El documento se ha estructurado en tres grandes apartados: adecuación, función renal residual y prescripción en diálisis peritoneal continua ambulatoria y diálisis peritoneal automática. Recientemente se ha publicado una guía sobre el mismo tema, elaborada por un Comité de Expertos de la Sociedad Internacional de Diálisis Peritoneal (ISPD) (2020). En consideración a las aportaciones del grupo de expertos de la ISPD y a la cuasi simultaneidad de los dos proyectos se hacen referencias a esta guía en los apartados pertinentes. Se ha seguido una metodología sistemática (GRADE), que especifica el nivel de evidencia y la fuerza de las sugerencias y recomendaciones propuestas, y facilita actualizaciones futuras de la guía. información del artículo Historia del artículo: Recibido el XXX Aceptado el XXX On-line el XXX In recent years, the meaning of adequacy in peritoneal dialysis has changed. We have witnessed a transition from an exclusive achievement of specific objectives –namely solute clearances and ultrafiltration– to a more holistic approach more focused to on the quality of life of these patients. The purpose of this document is to provide recommendations, updated and oriented to social and health environment, for the adequacy and prescription of peritoneal dialysis. The document has been divided into three main sections: adequacy, residual kidney function and prescription of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis. Recently, a guide on the same topic has been published by a Committee of Experts of the International Society of Peritoneal Dialysis (ISPD 2020). In consideration of the contributions of the group of experts and the quasi-simultaneity of the two projects, references are made to this guide in the relevant sections. We have used a systematic methodology (GRADE), which specifies the level of evidence and the strength of the proposed suggestions and recommendations, facilitating future updates of the document.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".