Intra-annual velocity variability extracted from multi-sensor and multi-temporal datasets produced by different processing chains
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ice velocity products with a sub-annual resolution are needed to better understand subglacial hydrology, glacier instabilities and glacier response to short-term events, such as calving or increased melt. Different processing chains are now releasing scene-pair velocities worldwide (ITS_LIVE, GOLIVE, RETREAT, PROMICE, MEaSUREs, Millan et al., 2019). Their temporal resolution is up to 2 days and their spatial sampling up to 50 m. However, analysing the sub-annual variability of glacier dynamics on a global scale remains challenging. Indeed, the amplitude of the velocity at high temporal resolution is frequently smaller than the uncertainty in many areas. In addition, the available datasets are complex to use because the velocities span different temporal baselines, are derived from images from different sensors, and are computed using different correlation and post-processing parameters. The methods developed to post-process ice velocities usually select only a subset of the datasets, require strong a priori knowledge of glacier velocities, remain sensitive to systematic errors and/or have not been validated for different glacier dynamics. Therefore, there is a need to develop and validate an operational method able to fully exploit the available ice velocity datasets in order to provide homogeneous and robust sub-annual velocity time series.Here, we propose a method based on the temporal closure of the displacement measurement network. To be robust to both systematic and random errors (e.g., temporal decorrelation and random noise), we invert the system using an iterative reweighted least square with a robust downweighting function. We propose a regularisation strategy that can account for different glacier dynamics (e.g., normal vs. surge flow). The performance of the method is evaluated using GNSS stations in the Yukon (Canada) and the European Alps. The resulting velocity time series have a homogeneous temporal sampling and reduced uncertainty (up to 60%). Annual velocity peaks are retrieved with a Mean Absolute Error in the order of 10 to 30 days, and 1 to 40 m/y. The results reveal the spatio-temporal propagation of annual velocity peaks and glacier surges along glacier centerlines. This method can be applied to any available dataset. The code will be published in a github repository.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".