MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392661489 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2023-0225

Rhodium-catalyzed ring-opening reactions of heterobicyclic akenes with heteroarene nucleophiles: an experimental and computational investigation

2024· article· en· W4392661489 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Austin Pounder, Eric Neufeld, Leanne D. Chen, William Tam

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicCatalytic C–H Functionalization Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersAlliance de recherche numérique du Canada
KeywordsChemistryNucleophileReactivity (psychology)RhodiumDensity functional theoryDiastereomerCatalysisRing (chemistry)IridiumYield (engineering)SelectivityComputational chemistryMedicinal chemistryCombinatorial chemistryStereochemistryOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an experimental and computational investigation into the rhodium-catalyzed ring-opening reactions of heterobicyclic alkenes with heteroarene nucleophiles. The reaction provides a facile route to trans-substituted dihydronaphthalen-1-ol and 1-amino-dihydronaphthalene products in up to a 95% yield as a single diastereomer. This reaction is 100% atom-economic and offers C–C bond formation without prior functionalization of the coupling partners. The mechanism and origins of selectivity were probed with density functional theory (DFT) at the MN15/Def2-TZVPP level of theory. The energetic barriers between iridium- and rhodium-catalyzed pathways were compared via DFT. Additionally, the reactivity and energetic barriers across diverse heterobicyclic alkenes and heteroarenes were calculated to unveil their relative reactivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicCatalytic C–H Functionalization MethodsFrench-language works237,207