A New Sea Ice Type Concentration Retrieval Algorithm from Microwave Remote Sensing Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sea ice types, e.g., first-year ice (FYI) and multi-year ice (MYI), can be discriminated based on their radiometric and scattering signatures. However, changes in ice surfaces caused by factors such as ice deformation and melt-refreeze events can lead to extensive ice type misclassification. To solve this problem, a new sea ice type concentration (SITC) algorithm from microwave observations (SITCAM) is proposed in this study. It builds upon a previous algorithm, namely ECICE, but improves from two perspectives. Firstly, a new cost function is employed, with weights indicating the separation efficiencies of microwave parameters. Secondly, a pre-classification scheme is incorporated to account for the bimodal distributions in microwave characteristics. With SITCAM, daily Arctic SITCs are retrieved for the winters of 2002–2011 using passive (AMSR-E) and active (QuikSCAT and ASCAT) microwave data. The results are compared with a sea ice age product (SIA) and evaluated with ice type samples and SAR images. Overall, SITCAM performs well on mitigating the misclassifications induced by the aforementioned factors. The Arctic MYI area agrees well with that from SIA. Compared to ECICE, the retrieval accuracy for MYI and FYI samples increases to 96% and 90%, respectively (increasing by 5% and 15%, respectively), in SITCAM. The bias in MYI concentration between the SITC retrievals and SAR-based results has reduced from 15% to 4%. Furthermore, instead of being limited to specific observations (e.g., Ku-band scatterometer data), SITCAM performs well with various combinations of microwave data, even solely passive microwave data. This universality allows for a long-term record of SITC, which enables the potential of dating SITC back to late 1970s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".