MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392662029 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-20248

Use of an urban fjord as a living laboratory for understanding impacts of hypoxia on nitrous oxide production and iodine cycling, and for testing of mitigation strategies.

2024· preprint· en· W4392662029 on OpenAlexaffabout
Douglas W.R. Wallace, Qiang Shi, Julie LaRoche, Martha Segura Guzman, Subhadeep Rakshit, Christopher K. Algar, Ludovic Pascal, Gwénaëlle Chaillou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à RimouskiDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNitrous oxideCyclingFjordHypoxia (environmental)Environmental scienceIodineEnvironmental chemistryOxygenOceanographyChemistryEcologyBiologyGeologyForestryGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Bedford Basin is a a 70 m deep, seasonally stratified and hypoxic semi-enclosed fjord on the West Atlantic coast (Nova Scotia, Canada). The basin is connected to the Atlantic Ocean (Scotian Shelf) via a narrow 20 m deep sill that restricts exchange and mixing of surface and bottom waters. Bedford Basin is located in an urban setting (Halifax) and receives considerable wastewater input. The Basin has benefitted from a weekly multidisiciplinary time-series of physical, chemical and microbiological data over several decades. Over the past decade, the intensity of hypoxia has increased due to warmer winters and reduced convective renewal of the deeper water. The presentation will highlight understanding of physical-microbiological-chemical interactions, and sediment-water exchanges, that affect the concentration and speciation of nitrogen and iodine species in relation to variable levels of oxygen. A focus will be on interannual and short-term variability in production of nitrous oxide and iodide in relation to variations in oxygen, microbial diversity and sediment-water exchange. The potential of coastal basins to act as living laboratories for  studying complex, redox-dependent processes through comprehensive, multidisciplinary, time-series study will be demonstrated. The closely related potential of urban fjords to act as testbeds for evaluation of emerging approaches to the mitigation of coastal hypoxia will be emphasized.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.156
Threshold uncertainty score0.732

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207