Use of an urban fjord as a living laboratory for understanding impacts of hypoxia on nitrous oxide production and iodine cycling, and for testing of mitigation strategies.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Bedford Basin is a a 70 m deep, seasonally stratified and hypoxic semi-enclosed fjord on the West Atlantic coast (Nova Scotia, Canada). The basin is connected to the Atlantic Ocean (Scotian Shelf) via a narrow 20 m deep sill that restricts exchange and mixing of surface and bottom waters. Bedford Basin is located in an urban setting (Halifax) and receives considerable wastewater input. The Basin has benefitted from a weekly multidisiciplinary time-series of physical, chemical and microbiological data over several decades. Over the past decade, the intensity of hypoxia has increased due to warmer winters and reduced convective renewal of the deeper water. The presentation will highlight understanding of physical-microbiological-chemical interactions, and sediment-water exchanges, that affect the concentration and speciation of nitrogen and iodine species in relation to variable levels of oxygen. A focus will be on interannual and short-term variability in production of nitrous oxide and iodide in relation to variations in oxygen, microbial diversity and sediment-water exchange. The potential of coastal basins to act as living laboratories for studying complex, redox-dependent processes through comprehensive, multidisciplinary, time-series study will be demonstrated. The closely related potential of urban fjords to act as testbeds for evaluation of emerging approaches to the mitigation of coastal hypoxia will be emphasized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".