MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392667310 · doi:10.4000/books.irhis.8191

Entre attentes des lecteurs et exigences de la Propagande. Les choix de lecture de la presse du Nord

2024· book-chapter· fr· W4392667310 on OpenAlexaff
Jean-Paul Visse

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications de l’Institut de recherches historiques du Septentrion eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsPan Am Clinic
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

S’il n’existe pas de statistiques sur la lecture pendant l’occupation, tous les témoignages concordent, et quelques faits le prouvent, notamment la hausse de la fréquentation des bibliothèques1, les Français n’auraient jamais autant lu durant cette période, tout comme ils n’ont jamais été aussi nombreux dans les cinémas ou les théâtres.Lorsque le 1er août 1940, après deu

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.008
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications de l’Institut de recherches historiques du Septentrion eBooksSame topicPolitical and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207