MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392673813 · doi:10.13162/hro-ors.v10i3.5299

Examining Policy Shifts and Transformations in Indigenous Primary Health Care in Alberta, Canada

2024· article· en· W4392673813 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Danika Goveas, Stephanie Montesanti, Susan Chatwood, Lynden Crowshoe

Bibliographic record

VenueHealth Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de Santé · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousPrimary carePrimary health carePolitical scienceGeographyHealth careMedicineFamily medicineEcologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary health care (PHC) transformation continues to be identified as a key pathway to achieve health equity for Indigenous peoples. In Alberta, varying degrees of PHC services exist within First Nations, Métis, and urban contexts that are fragmented, under-resourced, and disconnected from each other, perpetuating existing health inequities. A retrospective policy analysis was conducted to a) analyze federal, provincial, and local policies to advance Indigenous PHC in Alberta; and b) examine the engagement of Indigenous peoples in PHC policy and decision-making. The review found that prior to and into the early 1960s, the federal government controlled Indigenous peoples’ rights to health. By the end of the decade, the federal government shifted their responsibilities to Indigenous peoples in an attempt to reduce their role in health care delivery. In the late 1970s, the federal government reaffirmed their responsibilities in providing PHC to Indigenous peoples by establishing Indigenous-specific policies. This led to the creation of many co-designed reforms and initiatives provincially to increase Indigenous participation in policy throughout the 2000s. Despite these advancements, more work is needed to ensure that health priorities important to Indigenous peoples are appropriately addressed. Future Indigenous PHC-focused policy reforms can enhance Indigenous health experiences by clarifying the roles of federal, provincial, and Indigenous governments in the coordination of PHC; by ensuring Indigenous representation at all relevant decision-making tables; and by actively working to decolonize the health care institution and promote health equity. La transformation des soins de santé primaires (SSP) continue d'être identifiée comme une voie clé pour atteindre l'équité en matière de santé pour les peuples autochtones. En Alberta, il existe divers degrés de SSP au sein des premières nations, des métis et des contextes urbains qui sont fragmentés, manquent de ressources et sont déconnectés les uns des autres, ce qui perpétue les iniquités dans la domaine de la santé. Une analyse rétrospective des politiques a été menée pour a) analyser les politiques fédérales, provinciales et locales visant à faire progresser les soins de santé primaires autochtones en Alberta et b) examiner l'engagement des peuples autochtones dans la politique et la prise de décision en ce qui concerne les SSP. Les résultats de l'analyse ont montré que, jusqu’au début des années 1960, le gouvernement fédéral gérait les droits des peuples autochtones en ce qui concerne la santé. À la fin de la décennie, le gouvernement fédéral a transféré ses responsabilités aux peuples autochtones dans le but de réduire son rôle dans la prestation des soins de santé. À la fin des années 1970, le gouvernement fédéral a réaffirmé ses responsabilités en fournissant des soins de santé primaires aux peuples autochtones, en établissant des politiques spécifiques aux peuples autochtones. Cela a mené à la création de nombreuses réformes et initiatives co-conçues au niveau provincial afin d'accroître la participation des autochtones à la politique tout au long des années 2000. Malgré tous ces progrès, il reste encore du travail à faire pour s'assurer que les priorités de santé importantes pour les peuples autochtones sont prises en compte de manière appropriée. Les futures réformes politiques axées sur les soins de santé primaires autochtones peuvent améliorer les expériences de santé des autochtones en clarifiant les rôles des gouvernements fédéral, provinciaux et autochtones dans la coordination des SSP, en garantissant la représentation des peuples autochtones à toutes les instances de décision pertinentes et en œuvrant activement à la décolonisation de l'institution des SSP pour promouvoir l'équité dans la santé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.307
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.012
Science and technology studies0.0090.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealth Reform Observer - Observatoire des Réformes de SantéSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207