MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392674417 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu24-17985

New U-Pb detrital zircon ages from the Upper Cambrian – Lower Ordovician Cow Head Group in the Humber Arm allochthon, Western Newfoundland: continental-scale drainage, local deformation, and global stratigraphy

2024· preprint· en· W4392674417 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jorge Iturralde, David J. Lowe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAllochthonGeologyZirconOrdovicianHead (geology)Group (periodic table)StratigraphyPaleontologyContinental marginDeformation (meteorology)GeochronologyGeochemistryTectonicsNappeOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Cambro-Ordovician Cow Head Group is an allochthonous sedimentary succession situated in the Humber zone of Western Newfoundland, the westernmost outer domain of the Appalachian orogenic belt in North America. It records submarine carbonate and rare siliciclastic deposits on a fault-bounded basin Laurentian margin shelf. It is characterized by interstratified carbonate conglomerate, mudstone, grainstone, packstone, wackestone, and lime mudstone. Mega-conglomerate along the Cambro-Ordovician boundary with anomalously coarse clasts are attributed to slope failure of the adjacent carbonate platform. While most authors agree that the transport and deposition of mega-conglomerate was related to seismicity and slope failure, their sedimentation have also commonly been linked to eustatic regression.To try and better understand the tectonic vs. eustatic forces driving the stratal evolution of the Cow Head Group, detrital zircon U-Pb ages were obtained from the Furongian Tuckers Cove and coeval Martin Point members of the Cow Head Group, and used to better constrain the tectonic, eustatic, and stratal evolution of the Laurentian passive margin. The Tuckers Cove Member is particularly significant due to its record of quartz sand influx into an otherwise carbonate- and mud-dominated basin, and because it underlies megaconglomerate sedimentation linked to terminal Cambrian faulting. Moreover, its sedimentation was coeval with the Furongian Steptoean positive carbon isotope excursion (SPICE), and with shelf regression and the delivery of quartz sand documented in otherwise carbonate-dominated intracratonic basins throughout Laurentia, including in central Iowa, Utah, and coeval shelf carbonates in Western Newfoundland. Such a correlation is supported by preliminary detrital zircon U-Pb results from the Tuckers Cove and Martin Point members, revealing a mixture of typical Laurentian cratonic populations including Archean (ca. 2.73 Ga), Paleoproterozoic (ca. 1.9 Ga), Mesoproterozoic (ca. 1.1 Ga), and Neoproterozoic (ca. 593 Ma) detrital zircons. This implies continental-scale erosion and sediment flux, with sediment sourced from a widespread Laurentian cratonic catchment during the Furongian, including Archean and Proterozoic sources like the Superior, Makkoviak and Grenville provinces, and Ediacaran rift-related strata from the western Newfoundland - Quebec Appalachians. At present these zircon data do not resolve tectonic versus eustatic controls on Cow Head Group sedimentation. Nevertheless, they validate the concept of continental-scale weathering, drainage, and clastic sedimentation across Laurentia during the Furongonian. More work is needed to understand the relationship between such punctuated and widespread sediment generation and Late Cambrian plate tectonics, eustasy, and SPICE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→