MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392681872 · doi:10.22318/icls2023.547433

Using Hierarchical Time Series Clustering to Capture the Trajectories of Epistemic Emotions: The Case of Confusion

2023· article· en· W4392681872 on OpenAlex
Byunghoon “Tony” Ahn, Clarissa Lau, Jason M. Harley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings. · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCognitive Science and Education Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health CentreMcGill UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsConfusionHierarchical clusteringCluster analysisCluster (spacecraft)Series (stratigraphy)Computer scienceDendrogramEpistemologyPsychologyData scienceCognitive psychologyArtificial intelligenceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explored the use of hierarchical time series cluster analysis to group learners based on their epistemic emotional trajectories while rating true or fake news articles.We analyzed one epistemic emotion, confusion, while accounting for the dendrogram shape and cluster validity.Our analysis highlights the dynamic nature of emotions by taking account of the temporal fluctuations of how an emotion is experienced.Such analysis can aid further research on how learners digest complex information.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.313

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.106
GPT teacher head0.370
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it