Multi-scale adversarial learning with difficult region supervision learning models for primary tumor segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. Recently, deep learning techniques have found extensive application in accurate and automated segmentation of tumor regions. However, owing to the variety of tumor shapes, complex types, and unpredictability of spatial distribution, tumor segmentation still faces major challenges. Taking cues from the deep supervision and adversarial learning, we have devised a cascade-based methodology incorporating multi-scale adversarial learning and difficult-region supervision learning in this study to tackle these challenges. Approach. Overall, the method adheres to a coarse-to-fine strategy, first roughly locating the target region, and then refining the target object with multi-stage cascaded binary segmentation which converts complex multi-class segmentation problems into multiple simpler binary segmentation problems. In addition, a multi-scale adversarial learning difficult supervised UNet (MSALDS-UNet) is proposed as our model for fine-segmentation, which applies multiple discriminators along the decoding path of the segmentation network to implement multi-scale adversarial learning, thereby enhancing the accuracy of network segmentation. Meanwhile, in MSALDS-UNet, we introduce a difficult region supervision loss to effectively utilize structural information for segmenting difficult-to-distinguish areas, such as blurry boundary areas. Main results. A thorough validation of three independent public databases (KiTS21, MSD’s Brain and Pancreas datasets) shows that our model achieves satisfactory results for tumor segmentation in terms of key evaluation metrics including dice similarity coefficient, Jaccard similarity coefficient, and HD95. Significance. This paper introduces a cascade approach that combines multi-scale adversarial learning and difficult supervision to achieve precise tumor segmentation. It confirms that the combination can improve the segmentation performance, especially for small objects (our codes are publicly availabled on https://zhengshenhai.github.io/ ).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".