MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392682095 · doi:10.1117/12.3009002

PyMieSim: simulating coherent and incoherent light scattering coupling

2024· article· en· W4392682095 on OpenAlexaff
Caroline Boudoux, Martin Poinsinet de Sivry-Houle

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicRandom lasers and scattering media
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncoherent scatterLight scatteringCoupling (piping)ScatteringOpticsCoherent backscatteringPhysicsComputer scienceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This presentation will describe PyMieSim, a Python package developed to estimate the collection efficiency of incoherent and coherent imaging techniques with respect to various scatterer geometries. In particular, it will focus on few-mode optical coherence tomography (FM-OCT), in which a photonic lantern separates projections of a backscattered wavefront onto the different linearly polarized (LP) modes of a few-mode fiber. Each mode is converted by the lantern into the fundamental mode of a single-mode fiber to produce a distinct OCT image. PyMieSim was used to predict how different scatterer geometries would affect the OCT images acquired from the different LP modes collected by the lantern, thus paving the way for sub-resolution OCT.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.880
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRandom lasers and scattering mediaFrench-language works237,207