MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392693547 · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2024.3376328

An Overall Framework of Modeling, Clustering, and Evaluation for Trapezoidal Information Granules

2024· article· en· W4392693547 on OpenAlex
Yiming Tang, Jianwei Gao, Witold Pedrycz, Lei Xi, Fuji Ren

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceData miningArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In existing granular clustering algorithms, the design of coverage and specificity does not fully capture the inherent structural characteristics of granular data together with the optimization issue, and the current weight setting for the granular data is not sufficient. To address these problems, in this study, the trapezoidal information granule, which is rarely studied before, is concentrated, and we come up with a novel granular clustering algorithm called the weighted possibilistic fuzzy c-means algorithm for trapezoidal granularity (WPFCM-T). Firstly, under the acknowledged principle of justifiable granularity, novel functions of coverage and specificity are designed for trapezoidal information granules, considering the internal characteristics of such granules. The idea of particle swarm optimization (PSO) is exploited to upgrade the established granular data, and then the trapezoidal information granule construction (TIGC) method is proposed to realize granular modeling. Secondly, an exponential weight is constructed with regard to coverage and specificity, while a novel distance via α-cuts is given. The possibilistic fuzzy c-means (PFCM) structure is introduced into granular clustering, in which the new weight and distance are integrated, resulting in the proposed WPFCM-T algorithm. Thirdly, the reconstruction criterion is studied to evaluate granular clustering, and hence an overall framework including granular modeling, clustering and evaluation is constructed. Lastly, through experiments completed on artificial datasets, UCI datasets, large datasets, high-dimensional datasets, and noisy datasets, WPFCMT has superior granular data reconstruction ability by contrast with other granular clustering algorithms, indicating that the granular clustering performance of WPFCM-T is better than the others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.488

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it