MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392693785 · doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3370869

A Hybrid Model-Data Vehicle Sensor and Actuator Fault Detection and Diagnosis System

2024· article· en· W4392693785 on OpenAlexafffund
Mehdi Zabihi, Reza Valiollahi Mehrizi, Alireza Kasaiezadeh, Mohammad Pirani, Amir Khajepour

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Research FoundationGeneral Motors Corporation
KeywordsFault detection and isolationActuatorComputer scienceFault (geology)Control engineeringVehicle dynamicsEngineeringAutomotive engineeringReal-time computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a hybrid model/data fault detection and diagnosis system applicable to any vehicle sensor and actuator. This system works based on comparing the measurements of a target sensor or the desired control actions of a target actuator with their estimations. These estimations are obtained by a hybrid estimator developed based on the integration of model-based and data-driven estimators leveraging the strength of each estimator. Considering the weakness of pure data-driven estimators in confronting unknown conditions, a self-updating dataset is proposed to learn new cases. After fault detection, the estimations of the hybrid estimator are used to reconstruct sensor data or find the level of actuator failure. To evaluate the performance of the proposed hybrid fault detection and diagnosis system, it is applied to a vehicle’s lateral acceleration sensor and traction motor. The results of experimental tests conducted on an all-wheel-drive vehicle show the effectiveness of the algorithm in detecting and quantifying faults in the target component.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicFault Detection and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207