MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392693946 · doi:10.1080/17442508.2024.2320846

Stochastic near-optimal controls for treatment and vaccination in a COVID-19 model with transmission incorporating Lévy jumps

2024· article· en· W4392693946 on OpenAlexaff
Driss Bouggar, Mohamed El Fatini, Bouchra Nasri, Roger Petersson, Idriss Sekkak

Bibliographic record

VenueStochastics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicCOVID-19 epidemiological studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalGroup for Research in Decision AnalysisHEC Montréal
FundersMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación
KeywordsEpidemic modelVaccinationUniquenessCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)PandemicMathematical modelling of infectious diseaseA priori and a posterioriMathematical optimizationOptimal controlMathematicsPublic healthTransmission (telecommunications)Maximum principleStochastic modellingComputer scienceApplied mathematicsDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)MedicineVirologyPopulationStatisticsEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The COVID-19 pandemic has triggered a groundbreaking reliance on mathematical modelling as an important tool for studying and managing the spread of the virus since its emergence. Public health preventive measures such as vaccination and therapeutics can effectively reduce or eradicate an infectious disease. This work investigates these two strategies for controlling the COVID-19 epidemic through a stochastic epidemiological modelling approach. The existence and uniqueness of a positive solution of the stochastic system is studied. A priori estimates of the vaccination and treatment controls are established. Sufficient and necessary conditions are obtained for the near-optimal control problem of the stochastic model using the maximum condition of the Hamiltonian function and the Ekeland principle. Finally, to support our theoretical results, numerical simulations for a combination of optimized vaccination and treatment strategies were presented to understand the challenges posed by COVID-19 in Brazil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.828
Threshold uncertainty score0.850

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.416
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStochasticsSame topicCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesFrench-language works237,207