MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392694329 · doi:10.1117/12.3000373

High gain and output power from a novel 17/125 – 56/400 PM Yb-doped tapered double-clad fiber

2024· article· en· W4392694329 on OpenAlexaff
Vincent Roy, Mathieu Boivin, Bruno Labranche, Sylvain Lavoie, Sébastien Deshaies, Quentin Martineau, Angélique Dubé, Louis Desbiens, Marc Deladurantaye, Antoine Proulx, Yves Taillon

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber Optics
Canadian institutionsInstitut National d'Optique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDopingMaterials scienceFiberFiber laserPower (physics)OptoelectronicsOptical fiberDouble-clad fiberOpticsDispersion-shifted fiberPhysicsFiber optic sensorComposite materialThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A polarization-maintaining ytterbium-doped tapered double-cladding fiber was made from an aluminophosphosilicate glass preform, with core/cladding diameters of 17/125 μm and 56/400 µm at the small and large ends of the flared section, respectively. Amplifier gain exceeding 50 dB and average output power beyond 200 W were simultaneously achieved after the 1032-nm seed laser, while amplified spontaneous emission was measured ⪅ 1% of total output power. This fiber also yields an optical efficiency close to 90%, near diffraction-limited output with M2 ⪅ 1.2 and polarization extinction ratio ⪆ 18 dB. The newly developed fiber holds the potential to combine two successive amplifier stages in a single device, with foreseen benefits for ultrafast fiber amplifiers and laser harmonics generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic Crystal and Fiber OpticsFrench-language works237,207