Mediality, Materiality, and Medieval Books <b>The Visualization of Knowledge in Medieval and Early Modern Europe</b> . Edited by Marcia Kupfer, Adam S. Cohen, and J. H. Chajes. Brepols. 2020. <b>Old Media and the Medieval Concept: Media Ecologies Before Early Modernity</b> . Edited by Thora Brylowe and Stephen M.Yeager. Concordia University Press. 2021. <b>Abstraction in Medieval Art. Beyond the Ornament</b> . Edited by Elina Gertsman. Amsterdam University Press. 2021. <b>On Parchment. Animals, Archives, and the Making of Culture from Herodotus to the Digital Age</b> . By Bruce Holsinger. Yale University Press. 2022. <b>Holy Digital Grail. A Medieval Book on the Internet</b> . By Michelle R.Warren. Stanford University Press. 2022. <b>Remember the Hand. Manuscription in Early Medieval Iberia</b> . By Catherine Brown. Fordham University Press. 2023.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fifty years since the birth of media studies as an academic discipline and forty since media exploded into the uncanny dimensionality of the Internet, medieval studies has gotten over its initial e...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.025 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".