Design of College English Teaching Model under the Background of Artificial Intelligence + Big Data
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As economic globalization develops and the people's cultural literacy level improves, English is more and more important in work and life. However, there are some common problems in today's college English teaching model (ETM), which are not conducive to students' improvement of English proficiency. Therefore, colleges urgently need to change the existing teaching methods and models. Artificial intelligence (AI) realized a high degree of intelligence of computer functions. Anthropomorphic thinking enabled computers to play a human role in teaching, intelligently guided students in oral language teaching, and promoted personalized teaching and automated management. BD realized the analysis of students' learning behavior, helped to find problems, timely improved learning behavior and teaching behavior, and improved course teaching. This paper will study the application of AI and BD technology in college ETM, and explore the effect of college English teaching after introducing AI and BD through a series of computing processes such as neural networks. The college ETM researched and designed in this paper was applied and tested in schools, and the results were obtained: the effect of college English teaching under the action of AI and BD has increased by 7.91%, students' learning efficiency and teaching satisfaction have been improved, and the attendance rate has also been improved. Attendance has also been guaranteed, and this technology has significantly promoted college English teaching.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it