MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392702810 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.054502

Approaching the conformal WZW behavior in the infrared limit of two-dimensional massless QCD: A lattice study

2024· article· en· W4392702810 on OpenAlexafffund
Nikhil Karthik, Rajamani Narayanan, Sruthi A. Narayanan

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
FundersOffice of Advanced CyberinfrastructureMinistry of Colleges and UniversitiesIndustry CanadaNational Science FoundationGovernment of CanadaSan Diego Supercomputer CenterInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
KeywordsMassless particlePhysicsConformal mapQuantum chromodynamicsLattice (music)Lattice QCDInfraredLimit (mathematics)Quantum electrodynamicsMathematical physicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two-dimensional QCD with <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><a:msub><a:mi>N</a:mi><a:mi>c</a:mi></a:msub></a:math> colors and <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><c:msub><c:mi>N</c:mi><c:mi>f</c:mi></c:msub></c:math> flavors of massless fermions in the fundamental representation is expected to exhibit conformal behavior in the infrared governed by a <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><e:mi>u</e:mi><e:mo stretchy="false">(</e:mo><e:msub><e:mi>N</e:mi><e:mi>f</e:mi></e:msub><e:mo stretchy="false">)</e:mo></e:math> Wess–Zumino–Witten model with level <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><i:msub><i:mi>N</i:mi><i:mi>c</i:mi></i:msub></i:math>. Using numerical analysis within the lattice formalism with exactly massless overlap fermions, we show the emergence of such behavior in the infrared limit. Both the continuum extrapolated low-lying eigenvalues of the massless Dirac operator and the propagator of scalar mesons exhibit a flow from the ultraviolet to the infrared. We find that the amplitude of the conserved current correlator remains invariant under the flow, while the amplitude of the scalar correlator approaches <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><k:msub><k:mi>N</k:mi><k:mi>f</k:mi></k:msub></k:math>-independent values in the infrared. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.612
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.Same topicQuantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsFrench-language works237,207