MULTIMODAL GRADIENTS UNIFY LOCAL AND GLOBAL CORTICAL ORGANIZATION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Specialization of brain areas and subregions, as well as their integration into large-scale networks are key principles in neuroscience. Consolidating both local and global cortical organization, however, remains challenging. Our study developed a new approach to map global, cortex-wise similarities of microstructure, structural connectivity, and functional interactions, and integrate these patterns with maps of cortical arealization. Our analysis combined repeated high-field in-vivo 7 tesla (T) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data collected in 10 healthy adults with a recently introduced probabilistic post-mortem atlas of cortical cytoarchitecture. We obtained multimodal eigenvectors describing cortex-wide gradients at the level of microstructural covariance, structural connectivity, and intrinsic functional interactions, and then assessed inter- and intra-area differences in cortex-wide embedding based on these multimodal eigenvectors. Inter-area similarities followed a canonical sensory-fugal gradient, with primary sensorimotor cortex being the most distinctive from all other areas, while paralimbic regions were least distinctive. This pattern largely corresponded to functional connectivity variations across different tasks collected in the same participants, suggesting that the degree of global cortical integration mirrors the functional diversity of brain areas across contexts. When studying heterogeneity within areas, we did not observe a similar relationship, despite overall higher heterogeneity in association cortices relative to paralimbic and idiotypic cortices. Findings could be replicated in a different dataset. Our findings highlight a close coupling between cortical arealization and global cortical motifs in shaping specialized versus integrative human brain function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".