«Arde / el mar pero qué importa». La intertextualidad de las aguas discursivas en El regreso de la lluvia de María Domínguez del Castillo
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabajo pretende profundizar en la intertextualidad de la poesía de María Domínguez del Castillo, en concreto en El regreso de la lluvia (Esdrújula, 2019). Domínguez del Castillo recurre al diálogo con otras voces para ahondar en los significados textuales y simbólicos del agua, el yo y el tiempo. Tales entidades aparecen desbordadas en una poética centrada en la búsqueda incansable del conocimiento. Siguiendo las escrituras de Woolf, Mann y Eliot, la de Domínguez del Castillo es una poética sustentada en la plurisignificación del agua como cuerpo moldeable a través de una hibridez de géneros que busca, insaciablemente, una lectura en clave ontológica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.012 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".