Investigating the relationship between sleep disturbances and white matter hyperintensities in older adults on the Alzheimer's disease spectrum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: While studies report that sleep disturbance can have negative effects on brain vasculature, its impact on cerebrovascular diseases such as white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) in beta-amyloid-positive older adults remains unexplored. METHODS: Sleep disturbance, WMH burden, and cognition in normal controls (NCs), and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD), were examined at baseline and longitudinally. A total of 912 amyloid-positive participants were included (198 NC, 504 MCI, and 210 AD). RESULTS: Individuals with AD reported more sleep disturbances than NC and MCI participants. Those with sleep disturbances had more WMHs than those without sleep disturbances in the AD group. Mediation analysis revealed an effect of regional WMH burden on the relationship between sleep disturbance and future cognition. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that WMH burden and sleep disturbance increase from aging to AD. Sleep disturbance decreases cognition through increases in WMH burden. Improved sleep could mitigate the impact of WMH accumulation and cognitive decline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".