MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392718025 · doi:10.1117/12.3003328

Ultrafast 3D photoacoustic system development using a matrix array transducer

2024· article· en· W4392718025 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Moradi, Hoda S. Hashemi, Vincent Vousten, Robert Rohling, Septimiu E. Salcudean

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrashort pulseTransducerPhotoacoustic imaging in biomedicineAcousticsMatrix (chemical analysis)Materials scienceComputer scienceOpticsPhysicsLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real-time 3-D photoacoustic (PA) imaging plays a significant role in volumetric imaging applications, such as breast imaging where PA has demonstrated significant potential. Challenges in 3-D PA imaging include long data acquisition time and limited compatibility with commonly used data acquisition systems. This paper introduces a new real-time 3-D PA data acquisition system using a matrix array transducer. Furthermore, we present a 3-D Delay and Glow (DAG) method for source localization that extends upon recently developed 2-D DAG. The experimental results show the functionality of the 3-D PA system. The DAG outperformed the conventional delay and sum (DAS) where axial, lateral, and elevational resolutions, respectively, are 0.06±0.00, 0.25±0.15, and 0.24±0.18mm for DAG and 0.14±0.06, 3.87±0.30, and 2.81±0.62mm for DAS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207