MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392718840 · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-0834-5

Algorithms and Architectures for Parallel Processing

2024· book· en· W4392718840 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLecture notes in computer science · 2024
Typebook
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of SciencesDalian Maritime UniversityUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaUniversity of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyNanjing UniversityNanjing University of Information Science and TechnologyPeking UniversityNational University of Defense TechnologyUniversità della CalabriaXidian UniversityDanmarks Tekniske UniversitetShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityTianjin UniversityShaanxi Normal UniversityGuangdong University of TechnologyOcean University of ChinaHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyDalian University of TechnologyHubei University of TechnologyLomonosov Moscow State UniversityTsinghua UniversityTrent UniversityTianjin University of TechnologyChinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaBeijing Jiaotong UniversityKanazawa UniversityKungliga Tekniska HögskolanBeihang UniversityNottingham Trent UniversityKalinga Institute of Industrial TechnologyHunan UniversityUniversity of West AtticaSouth China Agricultural UniversityUniversité du LuxembourgUniversity of Louisiana at LafayetteTulane UniversityChina Agricultural UniversityHubei UniversityNanjing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsBeijing Institute of TechnologyOhio State University
KeywordsComputer scienceParallel processingParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.124

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueLecture notes in computer scienceSame topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207