Co-Fostering Translanguaging Spaces through Design for Embodied (Re)connection
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Building the scholarship on design and equity in the learning sciences, our work attends to the role of languages, power, and historicity in the design process. In this paper, we discuss our design approach to challenge normative power dynamics by centering the concept of translanguaging in a land-based program with refugee children, on an urban regenerative farm. Our design is nested in the larger vision shared by participating teachers for reclaiming power and shifting normative power dynamics through languages. Guided by the corporeal and spatial expansion of languages, we focused on children's embodied employment of collective community practices, land-based knowing and full repertoires of semiotic resources in the presented co-fostered interactional moments. Through our interaction analysis, we highlight the child-led expansion of semiotic repertoires, embodied representations of community, identity and (re)connection to the land. These child-led moments forge new pathways for equity and design.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it