MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392726711 · doi:10.2118/218115-ms

Tight Gas Production Prediction in the Southern Montney Play Using Machine Learning Approaches

2024· article· en· W4392726711 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gang Hui, Fuyu Yao, Zhiyang Pi, Penghu Bao, Wei Wang, Muming Wang, Hai Wang, Fei Gu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTight gasProduction (economics)Computer scienceGeologyPetroleum engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Recently, the machine learning approach has been used to forecast tight gas production from unconventional resources. However, the performance of machine learning-based predictive models has not been successful with respect to actual field production. The poor performance has been ascribed to several factors, including the relatively few field data and few input data from geological, geomechanical, and operational information. This study uses big data analytics to develop a prediction model for Southern Montney Play in the province of British Columbia, Canada. First, a complete dataset is built, including ten geological, geomechanical, and operational characteristics for 3146 horizontal wells in Southern Montney Play. Then, the relationships between the first-year production and input parameters are evaluated, and controlling factors are identified. Finally, a comparative study of prediction models with distinctive training algorithms is conducted to find the best algorithm for predicting first-year production. The results reveal that the top features that contribute most to tight gas productivity are total injection volume, porosity, and formation pressure. Features with secondary effects are net thickness, fracturing depth, and number of stages. The other features, including permeability, gas saturation, horizontal length, and cumulative proppant injection, are the least related. The Random Forest algorithm with the highest correlation coefficient (R2=0.82) and lowest mean absolute error (MSE=0.15) is picked. The Random Forest-based production prediction matches the observed field production, indicating that the northeastern portion of the study area has the highest estimated tight gas productivity. This procedure can be applied to additional scenarios involving tight gas production and used to guide the future site selection and fracturing job size, thereby achieving effective tight gas development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.760
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→