MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4392726845 · doi:10.2118/218027-ms

Characterization of Wormhole Growth and Propagation Dynamics During CHOPS Processes by Integrating Rate Transient Analysis and a Pressure-Gradient-Based Sand Failure Criterion in the Presence of Foamy Oil Flow

2024· article· en· W4392726845 on OpenAlexaff
Liwu Jiang, Jinju Liu, Tongjing Liu, Daoyong Yang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransient (computer programming)Transient flowWormholeDynamics (music)Characterization (materials science)Transient analysisFlow (mathematics)Pressure gradientPetroleum engineeringMechanicsMaterials scienceEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceGeotechnical engineeringGeologyTransient responseSteady state (chemistry)EngineeringChemistryPhysicsNanotechnologyAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Characterization of the wormhole growth and propagation dynamics has been made possible with the semi-analytical models developed in this work by integrating both rate transient analysis (RTA) and a pressure-gradient-based (PGB) sand failure criterion in the presence of foamy oil flow. As for the theoretical RTA models incorporated with a PGB sand failure criterion and foamy oil properties, the nonlinearity caused by the latter is linearized by using the pseudofunctions. A sequential method is adopted to solve the coupling fluid-solid problem, while the source function and finite difference methods are applied to obtain the solutions for fluid flow in the matrix and wormhole subsystems, respectively. New wormhole segments can be generated once the PGB sand failure criterion has been achieved, while their updated petrophysical properties conditioned to the new pressure field can be sent back to obtain the solutions for the fluid flow in the next time interval. Furthermore, influence of sand failure/fluidizing and foamy oil properties on the dynamic wormhole network can be investigated with the generated type curves. Both wormhole growth and foamy oil flow dictate an upward fluid production at the early times, while the production-induced pressure depletion dominates the declining production at the late times. The fractal wormhole networks can be dynamically characterized by history matching the field fluid and sand production profiles. Both the sand failure degree and foamy oil properties dictate the effective wormhole coverage and intensity. Sand production is found to be influenced by both the breakdown pressure gradient and wormhole conductivities, while oil production rate can be dominated by the wormhole coverage and intensity. Foamy oil flow can increase oil production rate and increase the wormhole coverage compared with the conventional oil. The newly developed method in this work has been validated and then applied in field-scale to dynamically characterize the wormhole growth and propagation by considering both sand failure phenomenon and foamy oil properties within a unified, consistent, and accurate framework. In this work, a rigorously semi-analytical method has been proposed to dynamically characterize the wormhole growth and propagation for the first time by incorporating the RTA, PGB sand failure criterion, and foamy oil properties. Compared to the conventional numerical simulations, not only is this proposed method accurate for wormhole characterization conditioned to fluid and sand production profiles, but also such delineated wormholes can be readily integrated with any reservoir numerical simulators to assess and optimize any potential EOR methods in post-CHOPS reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis→French-language works237,207→