MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392726858 · doi:10.2118/218059-ms

A System Identification Approach for Spatiotemporal Prediction of CO2 Storage Operation in Deep Saline Aquifers

2024· article· en· W4392726858 on OpenAlexaff
Ajay Ganesh, Alireza Rangriz Shokri, Yessica Peralta, Gonzalo Zambrano-Narváez, Rick Chalaturnyk, Erik Nickel

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Canadian institutionsPetroleum Technology Research CentreUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAquiferComputer scienceCaprockData miningPetroleum engineeringGeologyGeotechnical engineeringGroundwater

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Estimation of subsurface storage performance before obtaining storage credit is a key requirement in development of a CO2 sequestration hub. Traditionally, reservoir modelling tools have been used, in similar engineering applications. However, physics-based models are computationally expensive for early decision making processes, particularly in deep saline aquifers due to large geographical spread and limited geological data. In this work, we present a system identification approach to rapidly emulate the geological CO2 storage operation. Leveraging 8 years of field performance data at the Aquistore CO2 injection site, we built non-isothermal EOS-based fluid flow simulations; multiple realizations were calibrated with periodic monitoring data of downhole injection rate, pressure, and temperature. We then tested the possibility of applying system identification techniques based on the proper orthogonal decomposition (POD). The POD models were formulated to include spatial variations in petrophysical properties, irregular boundaries, and multiple CO2 injection inputs. Additionally, we included multiple synthetic realizations of CO2 injection into saline aquifer with dependent and independent variables. The training and validation of POD models included a robust and complete data sets of the Aquistore injectivity performance at multitemporal resolutions, and time-lapse seismic surveys from the storage and overlying caprock formations. The accuracy and efficiency of POD models were measured using multiple quantitative metrics, including global root mean squared error, training time, and forecast time. POD was found a powerful tool to reduce the spatiotemporal dimensionality of the large Aquistore dataset and to speed up the training process. It also produced acceptable global errors compared to the scale of the downhole measured responses. The infographics of the entire pressure/saturation/temperature field variations, using a set of basis vectors and time-varying coefficients, indicated that POD is capable to capture the CO2 plume shape. The visualization of POD predictions suggested to employ smaller grid size around the injection well for higher accuracy and larger grid size near the model boundary for higher efficiency (when generating the training set using CMG GEM simulator). The Aquistore dataset included multiple injection and shut-in periods during the past 8 years. This highlighted the significance of multi-temporal issues when the inclusion of finer time resolutions during start and end of CO2 injection improves the performance and accuracy of POD models. However, when CO2 plume extent is significantly large compared to the reservoir boundaries, the number of time steps needed proper management to keep the training process within a reasonable time. POD-based proxy models offer huge reduction in data dimensionality and computational time. The results from our system identification approach using the Aquistore field data deliver insights into handling the multi-temporal multi-spatial nature of dynamic input data for prediction of CO2 storage performance; this approach has potential applications in other subsurface energy systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsFrench-language works237,207