MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4392730327 · doi:10.1093/gastro/goae003

A novel location classification system for Crohn’s disease based on small bowel involvement: a better predictor of disease progression

2023· article· en· W4392730327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Huili Guo, Jian Tang, Xiusen Qin, Minzhi Lin, Miao Li, Qingfan Yang, Zicheng Huang, Xiang Gao, Kang Chao

Bibliographic record

VenueGastroenterology report · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSun Yat-sen UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineCrohn's diseaseDiseaseInflammatory bowel diseaseInternal medicineGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Small bowel involvement is related to poor prognosis in Crohn’s disease (CD), which may be a potential marker to stratify patients with a high risk of progression. This study aimed to establish a novel location classification system for CD and to develop a predictive model for disease progression. Methods Consecutive patients with non-stricturing/non-penetrating CD were retrospectively included in the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, P. R. China) between January 2012 and January 2018. Patients were classified into two groups according to disease location: small bowel involvement group and isolated colon group. The primary outcome was disease progression to stricturing or penetrating phenotypes. Progression-free survival was estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier method. Results A total of 463 patients were analysed, with a median follow-up time of 55.3 months. Patients with small bowel involvement had a higher risk of disease progression than those with isolated colon disease (hazard ratio = 1.998, P = 0.007), while no differences were found between Montreal location classification and disease progression. Median progression-free survival was higher in the isolated colon group than in the small bowel involvement group (84.5 vs 77.3 months, P = 0.006). Four independent factors associated with disease progression were identified: small bowel involvement, duration of onset of >1 year, deep mucosal ulcer, and C-reactive protein levels of ≥10 mg/L (all P < 0.05). The nomogram model based on these factors showed good performance in predicting disease progression, with a C-index of 0.746 (95% confidence interval, 0.707–0.785). Conclusions Classifying CD based on small bowel involvement and isolated colon was superior to the Montreal location classification for predicting disease progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastroenterology reportSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207